The argument in Romans 13 is that believers are to be respectful when responding to authority. Thus, we must find ways to disagree that respect the office.
Key Passage: Romans 13.1-7
Who wants to be submissive? Not me!
But, in Romans, Paul discusses our ability to submit to God in Chapter 12. Then, submit to government authorities, Chapter 13. And finally, to each other, Chapter 14.
So, believers are to function in the general context of respect when responding to authority. Conversely, believers are not to be stubborn and unteachable.
Some Insights
The rationale is that authority is established by God, Romans 13.1. Thus, disrespecting authority is, in effect, pushing back at God, Romans 13.2.
Moreover, the general principle is that authority isn’t a threat to those who are lawful, Romans 13.3-4. Consequently, we are to respond in good conscious, Romans 13.5.
At times, authority can be a threat to the lawful. As such, that society is either lawless or is giving special treatment to the wealthy and powerful.
Now What?
Therefore, pay your taxes, Romans 13.6. This is the same argument Christ made in Matthew 22.15-22 when He said “…render to Caesar …”
Paul went on to say we’re to render to officials the respect due to them. Or, in simplest terms, we are to show respect for the office of the official.
Now, it’s obvious that some officials abuse power, thus disrespect their office. But, you still need to pay your taxes, even if you disagree with current policy or behavior.
Pay your taxes. Likewise, show honor to officials who are honorable. Romans 13.6-7 paraphrase
So, can you disagree? The example from Matthew 22 shows that we can disagree in a way that is respectful and rational. But, we’re not free to engage in the viciousness so common today, especially it seems among politicians.
What He’s Not Saying
This passage from Romans 13 seems to be focused on our response to authority. Thus, it’s context is broader than elected authority figures.
In my opinion, Paul isn’t arguing that all elected officials are always right. Or, that believers are obligated to buy into everything, or oppose everything, that comes from the party in power.
Remember, this chapter falls between a chapter on submission to God and one on submission to each other. So, the general frame of reference here is submission, not blind obedience.
Opportunities to Heal
Ok, where does this leave us? As a person of faith I should engage in my community and be a testimony in regard to issues where scripture is clear.
However, when the church begins to equate its world views with God’s endorsement of, or disdain for, a specific political party or group, then the church has lost sight of its mission.
Fact is, people are looking for clear direction. And, healing from life failures. Also, encouragement when they’re struggling.
Conversely, they don’t go to a place of worship to hear political commentary. They don’t go to hear endorsement of, or attacks on, certain politicians. Why? Because attacks or endorsements don’t address the pressing needs that drive people to search for answers.
Political extremism is an inappropriate way for people of faith to express love, and acceptance, and support for people in need.
It’s good to understand the basics of responding to authority, as presented in Romans 13. But, it’s better for people of faith to not lose sight of being salt and light to those around them. See Matthew 5.13-16.
It follows, I believe, that the sharp divisiveness of politics isn’t a way for people of faith to be salt and light in a highly-divided society like the United States is today.
Apply These Precepts
Spiritual discernment, combined with self-control, allow me to disagree appropriately.
Respectful obedience is part of the broader lifestyle expected of all believers.
“The Lord make his face shine upon you…” Numbers 6.22-27
Thanks for visiting. If you have any questions or comments about these posts, please contact me: larrydaleyoung@gmail.com